Provide a summary of the model runs for storms which may affect Fairfield County. Not a forecast, but summary of trends, positions and precip type/amount
Saturday, March 31, 2018
April 2
4-2 Started snowing 4am or so. The 11th cancelation of school this year.
3-31 Looks like another one. 2-6 inches for Mason Dixon line through CT. Exactly who gets the most is trending. Timing looks conducive for accumulation as it begins pre dawn. in CT and earlier elsewhere.
Trends:
GFS North
NAM North
Euro
Thursday, March 15, 2018
March 20-24 - last ones?
3-22 results
3-21
Some theories as to why this busted so bad, so far.
First, there were too many competing lows. Sucked the warmth, fuel, etc out of the atmosphere. The upper low should have fired that up, but with no energy available at the surface, no temp contrast, there was not a lot to work with.
Second, nothing predicted that it would stall for ten hours.
Third, I was looking at radar depictions, which were accurate on the models. However, the snow that was involved was minimal.
Lastly, its likely NJ, LI, NY all are pounded by this overnight. Not sure we get more than 3" now here. But its performing well elsewhere. Double digit snow so far from MD, PA, NJ and LI.
3-21 morning radar - shows heavy but not translating to inch/hr
Satellite
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The low is jumpy on the 18z nam. Wondering if chasing convection.
3-20 Continue watching trends. 0z NAM giveth, 6z NAM taketh.
NWS forecast this morning was mind blowing
Most guidance remains a 6-8" storm. I made a crude map last night for the first time ever.
3-19
Trends trends trends.
of course the 18z gfs breaks the trend.
Latest NAM
12z GFS
3k nam
Euro
Meanwhile, we've gone under a winter storm watch with the below currently forecast
3-17
The Upper Level Low circled over SE Canada is what will dictate if we get precip. Even the latest NAM takes the storm to our south and doesn't develop it much, due to the influence of that ULL. IF that ULL moves out and the two other circled areas phase (past hr 84) then game on for a strong noreaster. If the ULL stays, then it goes south. If the ULL moves out but the pieces remain separate, there would be some snow from CT to DE, perhaps VA.
Still a lot of disagreement in the gfs ensembles
3/15 Strong signals that something will happen next week, just exactly what is tbd. All models have something moving through, but is it over us, south of us and out to sea? Here's the NAVGEM from 12z today. Typically the NAVGEM is east or southeast of where the storm ends up. We use it as a guide to compare with other more dynamic models, so when the other models are south or east of the NAVGEM there is confusion. NAVGEM rarely gives a storm 3 days of life.
Meanwhile the 12z GFS output this snow map with a similar setup as NAVGEM
Canadian more south for now
JMA has great position
3-21
Some theories as to why this busted so bad, so far.
First, there were too many competing lows. Sucked the warmth, fuel, etc out of the atmosphere. The upper low should have fired that up, but with no energy available at the surface, no temp contrast, there was not a lot to work with.
Second, nothing predicted that it would stall for ten hours.
Third, I was looking at radar depictions, which were accurate on the models. However, the snow that was involved was minimal.
Lastly, its likely NJ, LI, NY all are pounded by this overnight. Not sure we get more than 3" now here. But its performing well elsewhere. Double digit snow so far from MD, PA, NJ and LI.
3-21 morning radar - shows heavy but not translating to inch/hr
Satellite
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The low is jumpy on the 18z nam. Wondering if chasing convection.
3-20 Continue watching trends. 0z NAM giveth, 6z NAM taketh.
NWS forecast this morning was mind blowing
Most guidance remains a 6-8" storm. I made a crude map last night for the first time ever.
3-19
Trends trends trends.
of course the 18z gfs breaks the trend.
Latest NAM
12z GFS
3k nam
Euro
Meanwhile, we've gone under a winter storm watch with the below currently forecast
3-17
The Upper Level Low circled over SE Canada is what will dictate if we get precip. Even the latest NAM takes the storm to our south and doesn't develop it much, due to the influence of that ULL. IF that ULL moves out and the two other circled areas phase (past hr 84) then game on for a strong noreaster. If the ULL stays, then it goes south. If the ULL moves out but the pieces remain separate, there would be some snow from CT to DE, perhaps VA.
Still a lot of disagreement in the gfs ensembles
3/15 Strong signals that something will happen next week, just exactly what is tbd. All models have something moving through, but is it over us, south of us and out to sea? Here's the NAVGEM from 12z today. Typically the NAVGEM is east or southeast of where the storm ends up. We use it as a guide to compare with other more dynamic models, so when the other models are south or east of the NAVGEM there is confusion. NAVGEM rarely gives a storm 3 days of life.
Meanwhile the 12z GFS output this snow map with a similar setup as NAVGEM
Canadian more south for now
JMA has great position
Monday, March 5, 2018
March 7
3/7 results
17" wiped on table, 13" on deck, 14" on grass. Lost power for 36 hours at 5pm. From 6 - 7 pm we had 4" of snow. Lots of thundersnow, mostly NYC south during the above radar loop
======================================================
3-6 Will grab the 12z snow maps for later analysis. First wanted to post something that the NAM does at 850 with temps that I rarely see in our area.
Here are the snow maps
3-5 Evening
NAM Precip trend. 0z was a little weaker and the upper low came into play 3-6 hours later. Not much of an affect.
So it has this as the snow total.
Here's a 10:1 ratio picture with JFK getting 29"
Have a surface low going up west, spitting out a secondary and a cut off deepening upper low capturing the primary. The whole setup looks under done.
GFS upper low trend
NAM upper low trend
The above is the NAM run. Surprised the low doesn't deepen more
The Euro snow looks pretty good.
Or it could be the GFS
NAM looks a little far west with precip. My immediate area isn't less snow due to warmth, just less precip.
17" wiped on table, 13" on deck, 14" on grass. Lost power for 36 hours at 5pm. From 6 - 7 pm we had 4" of snow. Lots of thundersnow, mostly NYC south during the above radar loop
5pm 3-7 |
5pm |
4" between 6 and 7pm |
7pm |
8pm |
48 New Lebbon |
22 new lebbon |
Grays Plain |
Still hill |
Still hill |
======================================================
3-6 Will grab the 12z snow maps for later analysis. First wanted to post something that the NAM does at 850 with temps that I rarely see in our area.
Here are the snow maps
3-5 Evening
NAM Precip trend. 0z was a little weaker and the upper low came into play 3-6 hours later. Not much of an affect.
So it has this as the snow total.
Here's a 10:1 ratio picture with JFK getting 29"
Have a surface low going up west, spitting out a secondary and a cut off deepening upper low capturing the primary. The whole setup looks under done.
GFS upper low trend
NAM upper low trend
The above is the NAM run. Surprised the low doesn't deepen more
The Euro snow looks pretty good.
Or it could be the GFS
NAM looks a little far west with precip. My immediate area isn't less snow due to warmth, just less precip.
Storm 3 - could be the one! (spoiler, it was)
2/9 Set up is an upper low over TX that heads northeast into TN valley and then transfers off the coast. At the upper levels, there's ...
-
For DXR, Dec 1 to Feb 28, temps 1.6 above average, snow for entire season, 35-40 inches. Lots of ice and rain. 14 days with snow. 2 storms...
-
While its still 10 days off, the GFS is picking up an enormous trough for the eastern part of the country with the 0 line at 850mb (where it...
-
12-20 - post mortem - this was the day it was supposed to hit. After witnessing model flip flops from way ots to 30 inches in Millville and...